<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1830 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470588</link>
    <description>Contractors transitioning from the Karnataka Value Added Tax regime to the Goods and Services Tax regime may seek refund of the differential amount. Entitlement to the refund was not disputed, and the applicable directions in analogous matters extended to the petitioners. Refund claims must be considered after the contractors furnish complete particulars necessary to determine the amount payable, following which the amounts found due are to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1830 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470588</link>
      <description>Contractors transitioning from the Karnataka Value Added Tax regime to the Goods and Services Tax regime may seek refund of the differential amount. Entitlement to the refund was not disputed, and the applicable directions in analogous matters extended to the petitioners. Refund claims must be considered after the contractors furnish complete particulars necessary to determine the amount payable, following which the amounts found due are to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>