<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1500 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470592</link>
    <description>Regular bail in a money-laundering prosecution is discussed in relation to the continuing existence of a scheduled offence and the statutory twin conditions for release. The note states that quashing one EOW FIR and omission of the applicant from the predicate-offence charge-sheet did not negate the surviving scheduled offence or preclude money-laundering liability, which may extend to persons involved with proceeds of crime even if not accused in the predicate offence. It identifies Section 50 statements, witness material, allegedly forged reports, export documentation, invoices, adulteration allegations and company receipts as prima facie material. It also notes that detention duration and medical evidence did not justify bail, and reports refusal of regular bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1500 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470592</link>
      <description>Regular bail in a money-laundering prosecution is discussed in relation to the continuing existence of a scheduled offence and the statutory twin conditions for release. The note states that quashing one EOW FIR and omission of the applicant from the predicate-offence charge-sheet did not negate the surviving scheduled offence or preclude money-laundering liability, which may extend to persons involved with proceeds of crime even if not accused in the predicate offence. It identifies Section 50 statements, witness material, allegedly forged reports, export documentation, invoices, adulteration allegations and company receipts as prima facie material. It also notes that detention duration and medical evidence did not justify bail, and reports refusal of regular bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>