<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1500 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470592</link>
    <description>Regular bail in money-laundering proceedings requires satisfaction of the statutory twin conditions. A surviving predicate crime treated as a scheduled offence can sustain money-laundering proceedings despite quashing of another FIR and the applicant&#039;s omission from the predicate-offence charge-sheet. Money laundering may be prosecuted independently where material indicates involvement in processes connected with proceeds of crime. Statements recorded under the statutory investigation power, witness evidence, alleged forged reports, export clearances, invoices, adulteration allegations and company receipts were identified as prima facie material of knowledge and involvement. Detention following filing of the complaint and medical material did not establish grounds for release; regular bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1500 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470592</link>
      <description>Regular bail in money-laundering proceedings requires satisfaction of the statutory twin conditions. A surviving predicate crime treated as a scheduled offence can sustain money-laundering proceedings despite quashing of another FIR and the applicant&#039;s omission from the predicate-offence charge-sheet. Money laundering may be prosecuted independently where material indicates involvement in processes connected with proceeds of crime. Statements recorded under the statutory investigation power, witness evidence, alleged forged reports, export clearances, invoices, adulteration allegations and company receipts were identified as prima facie material of knowledge and involvement. Detention following filing of the complaint and medical material did not establish grounds for release; regular bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>