<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2149 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470597</link>
    <description>Delayed electronic filing of Form 10B does not by itself justify denial of exemption under section 11 where the audit report was filed before processing of the return and was available for verification. The audit-report requirement is substantive, but the prescribed mode and timing of electronic filing are procedural. The Assessing Officer must verify Form 10B and allow the exemption claim if the trust is otherwise eligible. The article states that a technical delay cannot defeat an otherwise valid exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2149 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470597</link>
      <description>Delayed electronic filing of Form 10B does not by itself justify denial of exemption under section 11 where the audit report was filed before processing of the return and was available for verification. The audit-report requirement is substantive, but the prescribed mode and timing of electronic filing are procedural. The Assessing Officer must verify Form 10B and allow the exemption claim if the trust is otherwise eligible. The article states that a technical delay cannot defeat an otherwise valid exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>