<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2089 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470579</link>
    <description>Execution of a sale deed pursuant to the Supreme Court&#039;s direction completed the conveyance and entitled the purchaser to possession of the property covered by that deed. The Karnataka HC&#039;s analysis states that this entitlement extended to vacant possession of the five-acre parcel forming part of the purchased land. Respondent No. 2 was directed to deliver vacant possession by 28 February 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2089 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470579</link>
      <description>Execution of a sale deed pursuant to the Supreme Court&#039;s direction completed the conveyance and entitled the purchaser to possession of the property covered by that deed. The Karnataka HC&#039;s analysis states that this entitlement extended to vacant possession of the five-acre parcel forming part of the purchased land. Respondent No. 2 was directed to deliver vacant possession by 28 February 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>