<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST reimbursement under gas-sale contracts requires admissible proof, while prior invoice payments do not automatically establish waiver or estoppel.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102257</link>
    <description>Contractual reimbursement of GST on gas-transmission charges depends on a plausible reading of the Gas Sale Agreement, and an arbitral tribunal&#039;s construction is not displaced merely because another interpretation is possible. The notes state that reimbursement could not be sustained without admissible evidence linking GST-deposit receipts to the relevant gas transactions; reliance on unproved documents despite an unresolved objection offends natural justice. They also distinguish waiver from estoppel: waiver requires intentional relinquishment of a known right, while estoppel requires representation, reliance and alteration of position. Payment of prior invoices under a clause requiring payment before claims may preserve supply and does not, by itself, bar recurring invoice-based claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:04:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST reimbursement under gas-sale contracts requires admissible proof, while prior invoice payments do not automatically establish waiver or estoppel.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102257</link>
      <description>Contractual reimbursement of GST on gas-transmission charges depends on a plausible reading of the Gas Sale Agreement, and an arbitral tribunal&#039;s construction is not displaced merely because another interpretation is possible. The notes state that reimbursement could not be sustained without admissible evidence linking GST-deposit receipts to the relevant gas transactions; reliance on unproved documents despite an unresolved objection offends natural justice. They also distinguish waiver from estoppel: waiver requires intentional relinquishment of a known right, while estoppel requires representation, reliance and alteration of position. Payment of prior invoices under a clause requiring payment before claims may preserve supply and does not, by itself, bar recurring invoice-based claims.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:04:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>