<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 130 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% E.O.U., in a case concerning the classification of processing on semi-finished yarn under the Central Excise Act. The appellant&#039;s processing activities, leading to export, were considered to align with the broader interpretation of &#039;manufacture&#039; for export purposes, as supported by a Board Circular. Consequently, the duty demand on the semi-finished yarn was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was entitled to the benefit under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the compatibility of the appellant&#039;s processing activities with the export-oriented manufacturing concept.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 130 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% E.O.U., in a case concerning the classification of processing on semi-finished yarn under the Central Excise Act. The appellant&#039;s processing activities, leading to export, were considered to align with the broader interpretation of &#039;manufacture&#039; for export purposes, as supported by a Board Circular. Consequently, the duty demand on the semi-finished yarn was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was entitled to the benefit under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the compatibility of the appellant&#039;s processing activities with the export-oriented manufacturing concept.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>