<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained breaches.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102236</link>
    <description>Foreign-currency remittances for overseas tournament services were treated as current account transactions because they did not alter assets, liabilities or contingent liabilities; related findings concerning the dedicated foreign-currency account, service-expense reimbursements, pouring-rights revenue, EEFC credits and authorised dealer liability were set aside. Reimbursements to the service provider were not borrowing or lending absent a loan arrangement or interest. EEFC-account drawals generally did not require prior approval, but remittances exceeding the recorded contractual liability constituted a contravention. Delayed repatriation of ticket-sale proceeds also constituted a contravention, while liability of office-bearers depended o.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:47:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained breaches.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102236</link>
      <description>Foreign-currency remittances for overseas tournament services were treated as current account transactions because they did not alter assets, liabilities or contingent liabilities; related findings concerning the dedicated foreign-currency account, service-expense reimbursements, pouring-rights revenue, EEFC credits and authorised dealer liability were set aside. Reimbursements to the service provider were not borrowing or lending absent a loan arrangement or interest. EEFC-account drawals generally did not require prior approval, but remittances exceeding the recorded contractual liability constituted a contravention. Delayed repatriation of ticket-sale proceeds also constituted a contravention, while liability of office-bearers depended o.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:47:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>