<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1931 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796045</link>
    <description>Penalty for attempted tax evasion requires sufficient material establishing a specific intent to evade tax. Full disclosure of mobile-phone accessories in stock-transfer invoices, coupled with an unsettled classification and tax-rate position, does not show concealment, misdeclaration, or evasion intent. The notes state that check-post powers target patent evasion and cannot replace regular assessment where documents are produced and the dispute concerns classification, interpretation, or taxability. Such disputes should ordinarily be determined by the assessing authority rather than through summary check-post penalty proceedings. The penalty orders based on alleged attempted evasion were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1931 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796045</link>
      <description>Penalty for attempted tax evasion requires sufficient material establishing a specific intent to evade tax. Full disclosure of mobile-phone accessories in stock-transfer invoices, coupled with an unsettled classification and tax-rate position, does not show concealment, misdeclaration, or evasion intent. The notes state that check-post powers target patent evasion and cannot replace regular assessment where documents are produced and the dispute concerns classification, interpretation, or taxability. Such disputes should ordinarily be determined by the assessing authority rather than through summary check-post penalty proceedings. The penalty orders based on alleged attempted evasion were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>