<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1933 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796047</link>
    <description>Supplies to an associated concern are not subject to cost-based valuation solely because of that relationship. The article notes that, where there is no evidence of flow-back or additional consideration, such supplies remain sales governed by the normal valuation provision rather than the cost-construction method under Rule 6(b)(ii). It states that an earlier decision involving identical supplies to the same associated concern applied the same approach, and Revenue&#039;s challenge to that decision was rejected. Accordingly, the alleged undervaluation demand based only on related-party status was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1933 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796047</link>
      <description>Supplies to an associated concern are not subject to cost-based valuation solely because of that relationship. The article notes that, where there is no evidence of flow-back or additional consideration, such supplies remain sales governed by the normal valuation provision rather than the cost-construction method under Rule 6(b)(ii). It states that an earlier decision involving identical supplies to the same associated concern applied the same approach, and Revenue&#039;s challenge to that decision was rejected. Accordingly, the alleged undervaluation demand based only on related-party status was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>