https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796060 Section 362 CrPC does not prevent the High Court from modifying or revoking conditions in an earlier bail order because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The High Court may use inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, read with its constitutional status as a court of record, where changed circumstances require intervention to prevent injustice. A bail condition requiring a substantial fixed deposit without a prima facie finding of guilt was treated as unreasonably onerous and impermissibly recovery-oriented. In view of stalled proceedings and the absence of an early trial conclusion, the condition was revoked and the deposit with accrued interest was directed to be released. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796060 Section 362 CrPC does not prevent the High Court from modifying or revoking conditions in an earlier bail order because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The High Court may use inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, read with its constitutional status as a court of record, where changed circumstances require intervention to prevent injustice. A bail condition requiring a substantial fixed deposit without a prima facie finding of guilt was treated as unreasonably onerous and impermissibly recovery-oriented. In view of stalled proceedings and the absence of an early trial conclusion, the condition was revoked and the deposit with accrued interest was directed to be released. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796060