<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1951 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796065</link>
    <description>A person required to provide information in an ongoing SFIO investigation has no enforceable right at the preliminary stage to obtain the Central Government&#039;s investigation orders or their underlying material. A notice under Section 217 identified the investigated companies, linked the information request to the person&#039;s financial transactions with them, and specified the records sought. Because the investigation involved multiple entities and the requested materials contained sensitive information, disclosure could prejudice the broader investigation and related proceedings. Natural justice remedies were not triggered because no prejudicial action had yet been taken; remedies may be pursued if such action follows.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1951 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796065</link>
      <description>A person required to provide information in an ongoing SFIO investigation has no enforceable right at the preliminary stage to obtain the Central Government&#039;s investigation orders or their underlying material. A notice under Section 217 identified the investigated companies, linked the information request to the person&#039;s financial transactions with them, and specified the records sought. Because the investigation involved multiple entities and the requested materials contained sensitive information, disclosure could prejudice the broader investigation and related proceedings. Natural justice remedies were not triggered because no prejudicial action had yet been taken; remedies may be pursued if such action follows.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>