<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1962 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796076</link>
    <description>Attribution of offshore income to an Indian project office must follow an arm&#039;s length functions, assets and risks analysis where dealings with the head office constitute an international transaction. The notes state that the project office performed limited technical-support functions, while principal deliverables, functions and risks remained with the Italian head office. Its transactional net margin method study showed a margin above the comparable arm&#039;s length range, with no demonstrated defect in the method or comparables and no contrary analysis. Accordingly, an ad hoc allocation of gross receipts was unsustainable; no further income was attributable to the project office.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1962 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796076</link>
      <description>Attribution of offshore income to an Indian project office must follow an arm&#039;s length functions, assets and risks analysis where dealings with the head office constitute an international transaction. The notes state that the project office performed limited technical-support functions, while principal deliverables, functions and risks remained with the Italian head office. Its transactional net margin method study showed a margin above the comparable arm&#039;s length range, with no demonstrated defect in the method or comparables and no contrary analysis. Accordingly, an ad hoc allocation of gross receipts was unsustainable; no further income was attributable to the project office.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>