https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796095 Where recorded sales are accepted and actual procurement is not disproved, an addition for alleged bogus purchases is confined to the profit element embedded in those purchases rather than the entire purchase amount; profit estimation at 12.5% was treated as justified. A difference between Form 26AS contract receipts and recorded turnover does not constitute taxable income in the year of receipt where it represents contractual advances carried as liabilities and recognised as income in the subsequent year, supported by corresponding tax deducted at source treatment. The Revenue's contested additions were therefore not restored. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796095 Where recorded sales are accepted and actual procurement is not disproved, an addition for alleged bogus purchases is confined to the profit element embedded in those purchases rather than the entire purchase amount; profit estimation at 12.5% was treated as justified. A difference between Form 26AS contract receipts and recorded turnover does not constitute taxable income in the year of receipt where it represents contractual advances carried as liabilities and recognised as income in the subsequent year, supported by corresponding tax deducted at source treatment. The Revenue's contested additions were therefore not restored. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796095