<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1993 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796107</link>
    <description>Overriding effect of the MPID Act, the Special Court&#039;s jurisdiction over seized assets, and the release of funds to escrow for depositor protection are identified as the central legal subjects. The text also concerns conflicts between special statutes and the legal validity of settlement arrangements. It indicates that these issues arose in connection with an order of the Bombay High Court, without providing the underlying legal reasoning or factual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1993 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796107</link>
      <description>Overriding effect of the MPID Act, the Special Court&#039;s jurisdiction over seized assets, and the release of funds to escrow for depositor protection are identified as the central legal subjects. The text also concerns conflicts between special statutes and the legal validity of settlement arrangements. It indicates that these issues arose in connection with an order of the Bombay High Court, without providing the underlying legal reasoning or factual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>