<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 2004 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796118</link>
    <description>Exceptional circumstances causing loss of a GST statutory appeal may justify writ jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the appellate authority&#039;s statutory limit and preserve merits adjudication. Where the order was uploaded in a portal tab not ordinarily used for notices or orders, the appeal was dismissed solely as time-barred, and the prescribed pre-deposit had been made, the delay was condoned and the appeal restored for decision on merits. As restoration entitled the assessee to contest the demand, coercive recovery through a garnishee notice was not warranted; the notice was quashed. The underlying tax, interest and penalty dispute remains before the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 2004 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796118</link>
      <description>Exceptional circumstances causing loss of a GST statutory appeal may justify writ jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the appellate authority&#039;s statutory limit and preserve merits adjudication. Where the order was uploaded in a portal tab not ordinarily used for notices or orders, the appeal was dismissed solely as time-barred, and the prescribed pre-deposit had been made, the delay was condoned and the appeal restored for decision on merits. As restoration entitled the assessee to contest the demand, coercive recovery through a garnishee notice was not warranted; the notice was quashed. The underlying tax, interest and penalty dispute remains before the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>