<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 2005 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796119</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST demand should not be entertained where the statutory appellate remedy under the CGST Act remains available. The notes state that an appeal to the Appellate Authority could be filed within the applicable period, including the permissible condonable period, and identify no ground for bypassing that alternate remedy. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue the statutory appeal rather than seek writ relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 2005 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796119</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST demand should not be entertained where the statutory appellate remedy under the CGST Act remains available. The notes state that an appeal to the Appellate Authority could be filed within the applicable period, including the permissible condonable period, and identify no ground for bypassing that alternate remedy. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue the statutory appeal rather than seek writ relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>