https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470550 A prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 filed after the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 commenced requires a pre-cognizance hearing under the proviso to Section 223(1); cognizance taken without that opportunity is described as legally unsustainable and must be recommenced after hearing the accused. The notes also state that revision does not absolutely bar inherent jurisdiction in exceptional matters involving liberty, and that compliant arrest and production procedures validate pre-cognizance remand. Remand beyond the statutory fifteen-day limit does not itself require immediate release where no prejudice is shown; bail remains subject to the applicable money-laundering bail provisions. en-us Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470550 A prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 filed after the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 commenced requires a pre-cognizance hearing under the proviso to Section 223(1); cognizance taken without that opportunity is described as legally unsustainable and must be recommenced after hearing the accused. The notes also state that revision does not absolutely bar inherent jurisdiction in exceptional matters involving liberty, and that compliant arrest and production procedures validate pre-cognizance remand. Remand beyond the statutory fifteen-day limit does not itself require immediate release where no prejudice is shown; bail remains subject to the applicable money-laundering bail provisions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470550