https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52967 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand under Section 11D. The duty confirmation on specific items was upheld, along with the disallowance of Modvat credit. The Tribunal clarified that mentioning duty rates in invoices did not imply extra charges to buyers and that the Compound Levy Scheme applied in this case. The appellants were found not to have recovered extra duty from buyers, and there was no evidence of duty being recovered beyond the contract price. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52967 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand under Section 11D. The duty confirmation on specific items was upheld, along with the disallowance of Modvat credit. The Tribunal clarified that mentioning duty rates in invoices did not imply extra charges to buyers and that the Compound Levy Scheme applied in this case. The appellants were found not to have recovered extra duty from buyers, and there was no evidence of duty being recovered beyond the contract price. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52967