<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 2037 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470539</link>
    <description>Prior-period expenditure arising from reconciliation of assets, liabilities and common expenditure transferred on restructuring is deductible in the year when the liability crystallises. The issue had already been resolved in favour of the assessee in an earlier decision, and review of that decision was rejected. The stated legal position therefore allows deduction of such expenditure in the crystallisation year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 2037 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470539</link>
      <description>Prior-period expenditure arising from reconciliation of assets, liabilities and common expenditure transferred on restructuring is deductible in the year when the liability crystallises. The issue had already been resolved in favour of the assessee in an earlier decision, and review of that decision was rejected. The stated legal position therefore allows deduction of such expenditure in the crystallisation year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>