<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1844 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795958</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on supplementary invoices is barred under Rule 9(1)(bb) where the supplier&#039;s additional service tax becomes recoverable due to fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement or other conduct intended to evade tax. Departmental detection of the supplier&#039;s earlier non-payment, together with only partial immunity and reduced penalty before the Settlement Commission, supported application of that exclusion; denial of credit with interest was therefore sustained. Penalty for wrongful credit availment requires culpable omission or conduct by the recipient. As the invoices contained the prescribed duty-payment and taxable-value particulars and no omission was attributable to the recipient, penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC was not imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1844 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795958</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on supplementary invoices is barred under Rule 9(1)(bb) where the supplier&#039;s additional service tax becomes recoverable due to fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement or other conduct intended to evade tax. Departmental detection of the supplier&#039;s earlier non-payment, together with only partial immunity and reduced penalty before the Settlement Commission, supported application of that exclusion; denial of credit with interest was therefore sustained. Penalty for wrongful credit availment requires culpable omission or conduct by the recipient. As the invoices contained the prescribed duty-payment and taxable-value particulars and no omission was attributable to the recipient, penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC was not imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>