<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1850 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795964</link>
    <description>Licensing pre-existing technical know-how, documentation and trademarks, without a client-specific engineering advisory engagement, is characterised as a licence to use intangible intellectual property rather than Consulting Engineer Service. Engineering subject matter alone does not convert the arrangement into consultancy, particularly where the provider is not a professionally qualified engineer or engineering firm under the applicable definition. Recipient-side service-tax liability for foreign services required express statutory authority and could not be imposed through delegated legislation before Section 66A took effect. Rules concerning recipient payment did not apply absent invocation in the notice or provider authorisation to pay tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1850 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795964</link>
      <description>Licensing pre-existing technical know-how, documentation and trademarks, without a client-specific engineering advisory engagement, is characterised as a licence to use intangible intellectual property rather than Consulting Engineer Service. Engineering subject matter alone does not convert the arrangement into consultancy, particularly where the provider is not a professionally qualified engineer or engineering firm under the applicable definition. Recipient-side service-tax liability for foreign services required express statutory authority and could not be imposed through delegated legislation before Section 66A took effect. Rules concerning recipient payment did not apply absent invocation in the notice or provider authorisation to pay tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>