<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1857 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795971</link>
    <description>Expiry of a letter of credit does not terminate an independently subsisting sale contract where purchase orders and subsequent performance establish continuing contractual obligations. Delivery to a carrier at the place of dispatch may constitute delivery to the buyer under the Sale of Goods Act, supporting territorial jurisdiction where the contract was accepted, goods dispatched, and payment receivable. An unregistered partnership firm cannot enforce contractual rights through a counterclaim because the statutory bar extends to set-off and related proceedings. Proven airfreight, demurrage, goods-related, and clearing expenses may be reimbursed and set off against the contractual amount, while liability of a bank or clearing agent requires an independent evidentiary basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1857 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795971</link>
      <description>Expiry of a letter of credit does not terminate an independently subsisting sale contract where purchase orders and subsequent performance establish continuing contractual obligations. Delivery to a carrier at the place of dispatch may constitute delivery to the buyer under the Sale of Goods Act, supporting territorial jurisdiction where the contract was accepted, goods dispatched, and payment receivable. An unregistered partnership firm cannot enforce contractual rights through a counterclaim because the statutory bar extends to set-off and related proceedings. Proven airfreight, demurrage, goods-related, and clearing expenses may be reimbursed and set off against the contractual amount, while liability of a bank or clearing agent requires an independent evidentiary basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>