<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1871 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795985</link>
    <description>Reimbursement of expatriate employee costs was not taxable as fees for technical services where the Indian associated enterprise exercised control and supervision over the seconded employees and was their real and economic employer during secondment. It paid their salaries, withheld applicable salary tax, and the employees offered that income to tax. As the reimbursement reflected actual salary cost without an income element, and no evidence showed that the Japanese assessee rendered managerial, technical, or consultancy services through the employees, contractual labels could not alter the substantive arrangement. The addition was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1871 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795985</link>
      <description>Reimbursement of expatriate employee costs was not taxable as fees for technical services where the Indian associated enterprise exercised control and supervision over the seconded employees and was their real and economic employer during secondment. It paid their salaries, withheld applicable salary tax, and the employees offered that income to tax. As the reimbursement reflected actual salary cost without an income element, and no evidence showed that the Japanese assessee rendered managerial, technical, or consultancy services through the employees, contractual labels could not alter the substantive arrangement. The addition was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>