<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1891 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796005</link>
    <description>A paper-form assessment order issued after electronic proceedings remained valid because section 282A permits paper orders to be signed, and any non-substantive procedural defect is protected by section 292B. Repair items for existing plant and machinery were revenue expenditure absent evidence of a new asset or enduring capital benefit, so the disallowance was deleted. Shop-floor consumables were allowable where purchase, issue and consumption records supported the accounting entries. Vendor advances written off for undelivered materials were allowable as business loss due to their business nexus. Relief-fund contributions were not deductible without proof that they were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1891 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796005</link>
      <description>A paper-form assessment order issued after electronic proceedings remained valid because section 282A permits paper orders to be signed, and any non-substantive procedural defect is protected by section 292B. Repair items for existing plant and machinery were revenue expenditure absent evidence of a new asset or enduring capital benefit, so the disallowance was deleted. Shop-floor consumables were allowable where purchase, issue and consumption records supported the accounting entries. Vendor advances written off for undelivered materials were allowable as business loss due to their business nexus. Relief-fund contributions were not deductible without proof that they were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>