<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796009</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment cannot survive where the underlying reassessment and the first appellate quantum order have been quashed. The notes state that reassessment was invalid because it was initiated without due application of mind; consequently, the assessment foundation for the penalty no longer existed. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796009</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment cannot survive where the underlying reassessment and the first appellate quantum order have been quashed. The notes state that reassessment was invalid because it was initiated without due application of mind; consequently, the assessment foundation for the penalty no longer existed. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>