<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796012</link>
    <description>Compensation attributable to development rights transferred to a developer under a pre-existing binding Development Agreement does not accrue as taxable income to the land-holding entity where the developer holds the exclusive commercial interest, funded acquisition, and assumed the associated risks and obligations. Retention of legal title alone does not establish entitlement to the full compulsory-acquisition compensation. Payment to the developer discharges an overriding contractual obligation, provided the arrangement is genuine and consistently implemented. Taxing the same receipt in both hands would result in double taxation where the developer has offered it to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796012</link>
      <description>Compensation attributable to development rights transferred to a developer under a pre-existing binding Development Agreement does not accrue as taxable income to the land-holding entity where the developer holds the exclusive commercial interest, funded acquisition, and assumed the associated risks and obligations. Retention of legal title alone does not establish entitlement to the full compulsory-acquisition compensation. Payment to the developer discharges an overriding contractual obligation, provided the arrangement is genuine and consistently implemented. Taxing the same receipt in both hands would result in double taxation where the developer has offered it to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>