<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 105 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52951</link>
    <description>In central excise, duty is determined by the price and classification declared at the time of clearance from the factory, and a later reduction in price does not alter the duty already payable. In the absence of provisional assessment, a subsequent fall in price does not provide a valid basis for refund. The refund claim was therefore not maintainable and was rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 105 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52951</link>
      <description>In central excise, duty is determined by the price and classification declared at the time of clearance from the factory, and a later reduction in price does not alter the duty already payable. In the absence of provisional assessment, a subsequent fall in price does not provide a valid basis for refund. The refund claim was therefore not maintainable and was rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>