<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1921 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796035</link>
    <description>Principles of natural justice require an appellate authority to afford a hearing and provide reasons when rejecting a statutory appeal affecting rights. A one-line rejection stating only that the taxpayer incorrectly declared the order-issuing authority, without explaining the basis for that conclusion or hearing the taxpayer, was treated as inadequate. The appellate rejection was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for a de novo hearing and a reasoned decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1921 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796035</link>
      <description>Principles of natural justice require an appellate authority to afford a hearing and provide reasons when rejecting a statutory appeal affecting rights. A one-line rejection stating only that the taxpayer incorrectly declared the order-issuing authority, without explaining the basis for that conclusion or hearing the taxpayer, was treated as inadequate. The appellate rejection was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for a de novo hearing and a reasoned decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>