<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1927 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796041</link>
    <description>The petitioner elected to pursue the statutory GST appellate remedy rather than obtain adjudication of the challenge to unsigned GST forms or the adjudication order. No merits were decided. Liberty was granted to file an appeal within three weeks, with the prescribed pre-deposit and grounds of law and fact. The appellate authority may consider the delay-condonation application and, if satisfied, determine the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1927 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796041</link>
      <description>The petitioner elected to pursue the statutory GST appellate remedy rather than obtain adjudication of the challenge to unsigned GST forms or the adjudication order. No merits were decided. Liberty was granted to file an appeal within three weeks, with the prescribed pre-deposit and grounds of law and fact. The appellate authority may consider the delay-condonation application and, if satisfied, determine the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>