<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1848 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470507</link>
    <description>Service tax liability cannot be presumed solely from income-tax returns or third-party data. Supporting evidence must establish the specific taxable service rendered, the service recipient, and the consideration attributable to that service. Where the demand identifies neither the alleged service nor proof of its provision, income-tax data alone cannot sustain the demand. On this basis, the service tax demand, along with consequential interest and penalty, was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1848 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470507</link>
      <description>Service tax liability cannot be presumed solely from income-tax returns or third-party data. Supporting evidence must establish the specific taxable service rendered, the service recipient, and the consideration attributable to that service. Where the demand identifies neither the alleged service nor proof of its provision, income-tax data alone cannot sustain the demand. On this basis, the service tax demand, along with consequential interest and penalty, was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>