<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1444 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470508</link>
    <description>Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires the court to be satisfied that an accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and is unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. The notes state that seizure records, Section 50 statements, shipping documents and links to an exporting entity indicated a prima facie role in transporting and concealing smuggled red sanders and involvement with proceeds of crime. They further state that framing of charge in the predicate offence is not a precondition for action under Section 19 where the competent officer has material-based reasons to believe that money laundering occurred. Non-cooperation, absconding co-accused and organised activity were cited as supporting further custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1444 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470508</link>
      <description>Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires the court to be satisfied that an accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and is unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. The notes state that seizure records, Section 50 statements, shipping documents and links to an exporting entity indicated a prima facie role in transporting and concealing smuggled red sanders and involvement with proceeds of crime. They further state that framing of charge in the predicate offence is not a precondition for action under Section 19 where the competent officer has material-based reasons to believe that money laundering occurred. Non-cooperation, absconding co-accused and organised activity were cited as supporting further custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>