https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470509 Pre-trial quashing of money-laundering proceedings should not rest on an assessment of disputed evidentiary merits. Questions about a respondent's knowledge of bank deposits and involvement in concealing proceeds of crime require adjudication at trial and cannot be conclusively determined at the quashing stage. The notes state that the High Court's evaluation of recovery evidence and absence of proof of knowledge was premature; the allegations therefore require trial determination. en-us Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:59:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470509 Pre-trial quashing of money-laundering proceedings should not rest on an assessment of disputed evidentiary merits. Questions about a respondent's knowledge of bank deposits and involvement in concealing proceeds of crime require adjudication at trial and cannot be conclusively determined at the quashing stage. The notes state that the High Court's evaluation of recovery evidence and absence of proof of knowledge was premature; the allegations therefore require trial determination. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470509