<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2126 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470516</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction is discussed as unavailable where the assessment record shows that the Assessing Officer examined the long-term capital-gain computation, obtained supporting details and adopted a plausible view. A brief assessment order alone does not establish lack of enquiry. The note states that the Principal Commissioner must identify a specific error and independently examine the record; directions for unspecified further enquiry amount to an impermissible roving and fishing exercise. It also notes that revision cannot rest solely on an Assessing Officer&#039;s proposal arising from an audit objection. On the stated facts, the revision and consequential order were described as unsustainable because the assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2126 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470516</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction is discussed as unavailable where the assessment record shows that the Assessing Officer examined the long-term capital-gain computation, obtained supporting details and adopted a plausible view. A brief assessment order alone does not establish lack of enquiry. The note states that the Principal Commissioner must identify a specific error and independently examine the record; directions for unspecified further enquiry amount to an impermissible roving and fishing exercise. It also notes that revision cannot rest solely on an Assessing Officer&#039;s proposal arising from an audit objection. On the stated facts, the revision and consequential order were described as unsustainable because the assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>