<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2130 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470520</link>
    <description>Section 270A distinguishes under-reporting of income from misreporting and prescribes separate penalty rates. Misreporting requires identification of an applicable circumstance under section 270A(9), which the penalty order did not establish. The statutory scheme does not contemplate a 100% penalty for under-reporting or misreporting in the manner imposed. The notes state that the penalty was also not exigible on the merits, rendering it unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2130 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470520</link>
      <description>Section 270A distinguishes under-reporting of income from misreporting and prescribes separate penalty rates. Misreporting requires identification of an applicable circumstance under section 270A(9), which the penalty order did not establish. The statutory scheme does not contemplate a 100% penalty for under-reporting or misreporting in the manner imposed. The notes state that the penalty was also not exigible on the merits, rendering it unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>