<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1836 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470535</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a GST penalty order should not ordinarily bypass the available statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority. The notes state that no basis existed for invoking writ jurisdiction without exhausting that remedy. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, and the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appeal. Time spent pursuing the matter before the High Court was directed to be excluded when calculating the appellate limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1836 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470535</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a GST penalty order should not ordinarily bypass the available statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority. The notes state that no basis existed for invoking writ jurisdiction without exhausting that remedy. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, and the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appeal. Time spent pursuing the matter before the High Court was directed to be excluded when calculating the appellate limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>