<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Additional input tax credit benefits passed beyond the required level prevented a profiteering finding for pre-GST homebuyers.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102184</link>
    <description>Additional input tax credit benefits in construction services must be passed to pre-GST homebuyers through commensurate price reductions under section 171(1) of the CGST Act. Applying the revised computation, including the pre-GST goods component, the determined benefit was quantified; however, documentary evidence accepted in the revised DGAP report showed that the supplier had passed on benefits exceeding that requirement to eligible homebuyers. The revised methodology therefore did not support a profiteering allegation because the full benefit had already been passed on in excess. The proceedings were disposed of with no contravention of section 171 established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:38:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Additional input tax credit benefits passed beyond the required level prevented a profiteering finding for pre-GST homebuyers.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102184</link>
      <description>Additional input tax credit benefits in construction services must be passed to pre-GST homebuyers through commensurate price reductions under section 171(1) of the CGST Act. Applying the revised computation, including the pre-GST goods component, the determined benefit was quantified; however, documentary evidence accepted in the revised DGAP report showed that the supplier had passed on benefits exceeding that requirement to eligible homebuyers. The revised methodology therefore did not support a profiteering allegation because the full benefit had already been passed on in excess. The proceedings were disposed of with no contravention of section 171 established.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:38:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>