<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Live nexus with the assessee is essential before seized broker records can support reassessment for alleged unrecorded consideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102182</link>
    <description>Reassessment founded on seized material requires a live and direct nexus between the material and the assessee. An inquiry-register entry held by a real-estate broker, which predated the land purchase, reflected land offered for sale and an asking rate rather than a completed transaction. As the entry neither identified nor linked the assessee or co-purchasers, and the named person was not examined, a survey-number match alone could not establish unrecorded consideration. The notice reopening assessment was therefore quashed as based on conjecture and surmise rather than material linked to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:37:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:37:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Live nexus with the assessee is essential before seized broker records can support reassessment for alleged unrecorded consideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102182</link>
      <description>Reassessment founded on seized material requires a live and direct nexus between the material and the assessee. An inquiry-register entry held by a real-estate broker, which predated the land purchase, reflected land offered for sale and an asking rate rather than a completed transaction. As the entry neither identified nor linked the assessee or co-purchasers, and the named person was not examined, a survey-number match alone could not establish unrecorded consideration. The notice reopening assessment was therefore quashed as based on conjecture and surmise rather than material linked to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:37:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>