<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 189 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52936</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid goods returned by customers for reprocessing where a valid declaration had been filed, the receipts were recorded in statutory registers, and the goods were re-used in manufacture before being cleared again on payment of duty. The Revenue did not dispute these factual records. Credit could not be denied merely because the goods had earlier been rejected by buyers or because the procedure under Rule 173H was not followed, since the returned goods formed part of the declared input stream and the reprocessing was duly established. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 189 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52936</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid goods returned by customers for reprocessing where a valid declaration had been filed, the receipts were recorded in statutory registers, and the goods were re-used in manufacture before being cleared again on payment of duty. The Revenue did not dispute these factual records. Credit could not be denied merely because the goods had earlier been rejected by buyers or because the procedure under Rule 173H was not followed, since the returned goods formed part of the declared input stream and the reprocessing was duly established. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>