<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1783 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795897</link>
    <description>Procurement of privately owned railway wagons under the Liberalized Wagon Investment Scheme did not constitute a taxable supply of tangible goods for use to the Railways where the wagons were acquired at the assessee&#039;s cost, dedicated to its own traffic, and unavailable for the Railways&#039; independent commercial exploitation. A taxable service requires an identifiable service rendered to another person for consideration. The Railways provided transportation to the assessee, while the concessional freight was a policy incentive linked to capital investment rather than consideration for wagon use. The arrangement could not be split into transportation and wagon-supply transactions; consequently, the service-tax demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1783 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795897</link>
      <description>Procurement of privately owned railway wagons under the Liberalized Wagon Investment Scheme did not constitute a taxable supply of tangible goods for use to the Railways where the wagons were acquired at the assessee&#039;s cost, dedicated to its own traffic, and unavailable for the Railways&#039; independent commercial exploitation. A taxable service requires an identifiable service rendered to another person for consideration. The Railways provided transportation to the assessee, while the concessional freight was a policy incentive linked to capital investment rather than consideration for wagon use. The arrangement could not be split into transportation and wagon-supply transactions; consequently, the service-tax demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>