<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1786 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795900</link>
    <description>Recall of an ex parte order requires credible proof of non-service, fraud, misrepresentation, or sufficient cause for non-appearance. Notices and hearing communications sent to the appellants&#039; admitted email address and by speed post were treated as served because the emails did not bounce and no material rebutted receipt. The record indicated wilful non-participation, while the recall request was made after about 400 days without a cogent explanation. In time-bound insolvency proceedings, the unexplained delay and absence of sufficient cause supported refusal to recall the ex parte order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1786 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795900</link>
      <description>Recall of an ex parte order requires credible proof of non-service, fraud, misrepresentation, or sufficient cause for non-appearance. Notices and hearing communications sent to the appellants&#039; admitted email address and by speed post were treated as served because the emails did not bounce and no material rebutted receipt. The record indicated wilful non-participation, while the recall request was made after about 400 days without a cogent explanation. In time-bound insolvency proceedings, the unexplained delay and absence of sufficient cause supported refusal to recall the ex parte order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>