<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1796 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795910</link>
    <description>Denial of an adequate hearing during assessment and appellate proceedings can breach principles of natural justice where an assessment is completed before a requested video-conference hearing and pending information are considered. The notes state that additional evidence, relevant to effective adjudication and not fully produced earlier for reasons beyond the assessee&#039;s control, may be admitted under Rule 29 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 for substantial cause. They further state that deciding the appeal while remand verification remained pending, without a remand report or final hearing, undermines procedural fairness. The stated consequence is fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer after adequate opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1796 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795910</link>
      <description>Denial of an adequate hearing during assessment and appellate proceedings can breach principles of natural justice where an assessment is completed before a requested video-conference hearing and pending information are considered. The notes state that additional evidence, relevant to effective adjudication and not fully produced earlier for reasons beyond the assessee&#039;s control, may be admitted under Rule 29 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 for substantial cause. They further state that deciding the appeal while remand verification remained pending, without a remand report or final hearing, undermines procedural fairness. The stated consequence is fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer after adequate opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>