<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 91 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that dissolving un-hydrous Ammonia in water to produce liquid Ammonia does not constitute manufacturing under Note 10 to Chapter 28 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Consequently, no additional excise duty liability arises on the liquid Ammonia. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 91 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that dissolving un-hydrous Ammonia in water to produce liquid Ammonia does not constitute manufacturing under Note 10 to Chapter 28 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Consequently, no additional excise duty liability arises on the liquid Ammonia. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>