<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1803 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795917</link>
    <description>Preference share capital cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit where the assessee establishes the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of investments through share applications, banking records, confirmations, tax returns, financial statements and corporate records. Receipt through banking channels supported the transactions, while uncorroborated investigation statements could not sustain an addition without an effective cross-examination opportunity. In the absence of evidence that funds originated from and returned to the assessee through investor companies, and in view of consistent decisions on substantially identical transactions, the Section 68 addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1803 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795917</link>
      <description>Preference share capital cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit where the assessee establishes the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of investments through share applications, banking records, confirmations, tax returns, financial statements and corporate records. Receipt through banking channels supported the transactions, while uncorroborated investigation statements could not sustain an addition without an effective cross-examination opportunity. In the absence of evidence that funds originated from and returned to the assessee through investor companies, and in view of consistent decisions on substantially identical transactions, the Section 68 addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>