<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1813 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795927</link>
    <description>Share application money and share premium cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit where corporate records, confirmations, tax returns, financial statements, bank records, allotment documents and valuation material establish the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness. Investigation material alone does not displace such evidence without independent enquiry, identified defects or valuation examination. The later proviso requiring explanation of the investor&#039;s source of funds did not apply retrospectively to the relevant assessment year. The quantum of share premium, by itself, was insufficient to justify an addition under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1813 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795927</link>
      <description>Share application money and share premium cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit where corporate records, confirmations, tax returns, financial statements, bank records, allotment documents and valuation material establish the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness. Investigation material alone does not displace such evidence without independent enquiry, identified defects or valuation examination. The later proviso requiring explanation of the investor&#039;s source of funds did not apply retrospectively to the relevant assessment year. The quantum of share premium, by itself, was insufficient to justify an addition under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>