<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1443 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470462</link>
    <description>Statutory disqualification under Section 12(5) and the Seventh Schedule renders a named arbitrator and an appointing authority controlled by that arbitrator ineligible, including for nomination. The incompatible contractual appointment procedure does not invalidate the underlying arbitration agreement; it may be preserved through appointment of an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6). For limitation, the period during COVID-19 limitation exclusions is excluded when calculating the time to file an arbitrator-appointment application. The notes state that the application was timely and that the dispute should proceed to institutional arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1443 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470462</link>
      <description>Statutory disqualification under Section 12(5) and the Seventh Schedule renders a named arbitrator and an appointing authority controlled by that arbitrator ineligible, including for nomination. The incompatible contractual appointment procedure does not invalidate the underlying arbitration agreement; it may be preserved through appointment of an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6). For limitation, the period during COVID-19 limitation exclusions is excluded when calculating the time to file an arbitrator-appointment application. The notes state that the application was timely and that the dispute should proceed to institutional arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>