https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470463 Section 30 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 confines correction of village maps and field books to genuine errors, omissions, or subsequent recorded changes; it cannot be used to reopen a final map dispute or relocate a plot for a more advantageous position. Where an identical map-correction claim has attained finality and no record error is established, fresh consideration is not warranted. Although remand orders are ordinarily interlocutory, a remand based on an incorrect interpretation of Section 30 may be challenged where it unnecessarily revives conclusively settled litigation. en-us Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470463 Section 30 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 confines correction of village maps and field books to genuine errors, omissions, or subsequent recorded changes; it cannot be used to reopen a final map dispute or relocate a plot for a more advantageous position. Where an identical map-correction claim has attained finality and no record error is established, fresh consideration is not warranted. Although remand orders are ordinarily interlocutory, a remand based on an incorrect interpretation of Section 30 may be challenged where it unnecessarily revives conclusively settled litigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470463