https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470465 Bail in the alleged money-laundering offence was considered appropriate because the investigation had concluded, the complaint had been filed, and trial had not commenced. The applicant had remained in custody since April 2024, had secured bail in the scheduled-offence and connected matters, and co-accused had received bail in the money-laundering proceedings. Release was warranted without any determination on the merits of the allegations. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470465 Bail in the alleged money-laundering offence was considered appropriate because the investigation had concluded, the complaint had been filed, and trial had not commenced. The applicant had remained in custody since April 2024, had secured bail in the scheduled-offence and connected matters, and co-accused had received bail in the money-laundering proceedings. Release was warranted without any determination on the merits of the allegations. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470465