<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2107 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470468</link>
    <description>Reassessment of an alleged agent of a non-resident requires prior determination of representative-assessee status after the prescribed opportunity to contest that status. This determination is a jurisdictional prerequisite because it preserves the proposed agent&#039;s statutory right to challenge liability in that capacity; reassessment initiated before it is invalid. Protective assessment is permissible only where there is genuine doubt about the person taxable on particular income. Reopening solely for a protective assessment cannot be sustained where no substantive assessment has been made in any taxpayer&#039;s hands. The reassessment was therefore invalid for both lack of prior representative-assessee determination and absence of a substantive assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2107 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470468</link>
      <description>Reassessment of an alleged agent of a non-resident requires prior determination of representative-assessee status after the prescribed opportunity to contest that status. This determination is a jurisdictional prerequisite because it preserves the proposed agent&#039;s statutory right to challenge liability in that capacity; reassessment initiated before it is invalid. Protective assessment is permissible only where there is genuine doubt about the person taxable on particular income. Reopening solely for a protective assessment cannot be sustained where no substantive assessment has been made in any taxpayer&#039;s hands. The reassessment was therefore invalid for both lack of prior representative-assessee determination and absence of a substantive assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>