<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2107 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470468</link>
    <description>Prior determination of representative-assessee status is a jurisdictional prerequisite to reassessing an alleged agent of a non-resident. The proposed agent must receive the prescribed opportunity to contest that status before a reassessment notice is issued in that capacity; initiating reassessment first renders it invalid. Protective assessment is permissible only where genuine doubt exists about the person taxable on particular income and requires a substantive assessment in a taxpayer&#039;s case. Reopening solely for a protective assessment, without any substantive assessment identifying the taxable person, is unsustainable. The notes state that both defects deprived the reassessment of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2107 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470468</link>
      <description>Prior determination of representative-assessee status is a jurisdictional prerequisite to reassessing an alleged agent of a non-resident. The proposed agent must receive the prescribed opportunity to contest that status before a reassessment notice is issued in that capacity; initiating reassessment first renders it invalid. Protective assessment is permissible only where genuine doubt exists about the person taxable on particular income and requires a substantive assessment in a taxpayer&#039;s case. Reopening solely for a protective assessment, without any substantive assessment identifying the taxable person, is unsustainable. The notes state that both defects deprived the reassessment of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>