<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2118 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470479</link>
    <description>Disallowance of related-party purchases under section 40A(2)(b) cannot rest on Form 3CD reporting for a different assessment year. The notes state that the relevant assessment year had no tax audit or Form 3CD, while the assessing authority relied on a tax-audit report relating to the preceding financial year. As the Revenue did not rebut this mismatch, the disallowance lacked a factual basis and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2118 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470479</link>
      <description>Disallowance of related-party purchases under section 40A(2)(b) cannot rest on Form 3CD reporting for a different assessment year. The notes state that the relevant assessment year had no tax audit or Form 3CD, while the assessing authority relied on a tax-audit report relating to the preceding financial year. As the Revenue did not rebut this mismatch, the disallowance lacked a factual basis and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>