<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2121 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470482</link>
    <description>Documented penny-stock capital-gains transactions cannot be treated as unexplained solely on investigation-wing information where the taxpayer provides purchase and sale records, broker details, bank records, demat statements and contract notes. Independent verification of those materials, evidence from brokers or banks, examination of the company&#039;s financials, or proof that the taxpayer received accommodation entries is required to displace the documentary record. A mismatch between the transaction value adopted in assessment and broker-supported records further weakens the addition. Additions for unexplained credits and estimated commission expenditure were deleted because suspicion did not constitute cogent contrary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2121 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470482</link>
      <description>Documented penny-stock capital-gains transactions cannot be treated as unexplained solely on investigation-wing information where the taxpayer provides purchase and sale records, broker details, bank records, demat statements and contract notes. Independent verification of those materials, evidence from brokers or banks, examination of the company&#039;s financials, or proof that the taxpayer received accommodation entries is required to displace the documentary record. A mismatch between the transaction value adopted in assessment and broker-supported records further weakens the addition. Additions for unexplained credits and estimated commission expenditure were deleted because suspicion did not constitute cogent contrary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>